Teen Forums - Teen Chat, Teen Help, Teen Advice & Support

These are works of utter genius, satirical comedy at it's absolute best!

The two I have chosen are the two most people have heard of.

The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

And

Invisible Pink Unicorn

Basically, creationists like to believe that God created the world and a load of other bullshit lies. So, since scientists can't disprove this because the Christians say, "Proof it didn't happen?", a few of them created satirical relgions

And, Christians like to believe that correlation proves causation, producing bullshit statements like, "The more people who believe in god, the less crime takes place". The obvious genius response was iratesVsTemp_English.jpg" target="_blank">this. Genius. (FYI, Pirates is the collective term of the people who follow The Church of FSM)

Obviously, Christians took offence (Christians, sensitive about religion, SHOCK) and called it blasphemy, but, and here is the extra special awesome part. Christians can't disprove the Flying Spaghetti Monsters hilarious version of how the world was conceived.


So, Christians, how do you respond?

The Almighty Cult of Franken Fran pretty much sums up my opinion of it all.
If there was one animal that could see God, what would it be? Why the Dog of course! I mean, seriously. Now quick boy, who is your God? lol
The would choose the woman, wouldn't they?

*gigglesnort*

I respond with a sadist parody of said parody. I'm not insulted by petty shit. Instead, I'd rather prefer to sink to an even lower level to make even more fun of an Atheists childish ways.
It's more fun for me that way because I'm already as cruel as a child, like so many Atheists already are~~

FYI: You can't disprove dogs can't see God either. After all, that's why dogs are called "Mans best friend". Franken Fran explained it pretty well, I think.

Oh, as for the Invisible Pink Unicorn. Something can be Invisible and Pink at the same time you know. Just not to the same people at once.
In which case, what are you smoking and can I have some? lolololololol

Nothing? Was my awesome childlike pettiness too childlike and petty for you to possibly go beneath it?

Fuck yes! I win! Never underestimate a Christian who thinks like an Atheist. It ends badly for people on both sides.

You can be a christian.

But, do you honestly believe in Creationism?

Like, seriously?

And you can believe in nothing but do you seriously - wait, something can't come from nothing!


Say what?!


OT: Just asking here, I know you saw my earlier posts. SO I'm wondering why did you not reply earlier, huh?

Personally, if the Big Bang wasn't real.

It's entirely possible that the Universe is perpetual.

And, if something can't come from nothing, how did god just Pop things into existence.

Creationism is the result of ignorant paedophiles hiding from Science

I'll ask God when I see him then I'll have that certain Angel (damn, what's his name?) send you the message in hell. If He tells me that is.

And Darwinism is the attempt for humans with severe God-complexes (oh the irony) to try and make a justification for said complex. Or put more simply, it's for arrogant assholes who want justification in that it's okay to be an arrogant asshole.

You humans, so pathetic. I could never see what God valued so much in you. Well aside from that whole Free Will thing. Ha ha! I guess as His most favored creation he wanted us to choose if we love Him or not.

Oh well. It all comes down to a choice. You can mock mine all you want. But the way I see it that...
In hell me and you are gonna have a lot of play time together, da? <3
Assuming hell exists that is. I like to think it does, it gives me something to look forward to, I mean I don't see why anyone would want to believe there's nothing after this. Seems miserable. Like there's nothing worth living for. Depressing. You don't get to take those memories with you and all.
Therefore logically living is therefore, pointless.

Depressing, logically that is. And seeing as how being depressed is illogical to me, I can't bring myself to believe in anything else. As that would be illogical.

Do you get it? No of course you don't. I never expected you to~~

Marietta, Atheism is not the result of arrogance, it is exactly the opposite.

Atheism, or Darwinism is the result of seeking answers, not believing what you are told to believe. The pursuit to discover is not arrogance, it is a trait of visionaries.

I would recommend a video for you, If you would watch it, but I doubt you would.

Atheism doesn't make me a bad person, it simply allows me to live my life on personal morals.

Tell me Ray, why is it that Piranhas don't kill each other, or Killer Wales, or Wolves, is it some all mighty magic piranha, killer wale, or wolf telling them not to?, Or is it just the fact that it's basic instinct?

And if think "Why yes, some mighty magic Piranha is up there!", you've broken a commandant, because the rules you are dictated by states there is only one god.

Creationists also believe that the banana is proof of god's existence because it fits perfectly into the human hand! hahahaha!

The banana has been genetically modified to fit our hands by SCIENCE.

They ALSO believe that our planet is super special, and other bullshit that Hydrogen can't change into a different state because God made it that way. Never mind Hydrogen fusion in the Sun, Hydrogen fusion when a Hydrogen bomb drops.


Science & Education ftw!

I respond by pointing out that the FSM is substance and is defined verily as an invisible being of this universe. By his very nature, he does not fit the criteria of a divine creator in that he is substance of the third dimension, which does not allot him the omnipotence needed to create the universe. The most notable being the parameter of duration.

Learned theologians (and for that matter, the majority of Christians, Jews and Muslims) do not accept the Warner Bros. doctrine of an invisible man in the sky. To begin to understand the complexities of the subject, it is first necessary to acquaint yourself with the string theory and follow up by understanding the tenth dimension.

As FSM does not fall under the criteria of the tenth dimension by his very description, his merit is ruled out. As is also the case with whatever other silly analogy atheists use to start arguments.

However, even beyond the many factors that coincide with theology, it's a moot argument. First of all, a theist does not need to disprove another deity to believe in the deity they choose to believe in. What is necessary is understanding of evidence that correlates with the subject matter of the deity they believe in and how it relates to the world. It would be a fallacy of me to say that an outcome satisfying more than one criteria is dominant over one that satisfies a solitary criteria -- but it is necessary to look at the big picture.

I had something I was going to say here, but I forgot what it was because I have the short term memory of a popsicle. Moving on.

Also, should be noted. Pretty much every group (yes, including atheists) are sensitive about their beliefs. And why shouldn't they be? It's their beliefs and if you're going to make fun of it, then they don't owe you any respect. True, many Christians are hostile to even discussion that obliterates their fundamental belief schemes, but the same can also be said for Muslims, Jews, atheists, Hindus, et cetera.

I am not a Creationist in the typical sense. However, I happen to know many Creationists who can argue circles around a number of Evolutionists. Best not to pass off an entire group of people because you don't believe the same thing as them. The more you trash talk someone, the more embarrassing it is when they topple you.

He didn't. God is, was and always will be. As you can see from the video above, the concept of duration does not apply to God.