I found this:
Taboos can include:- dietary restrictions (halal and kosher diets, religious vegetarianism, and the prohibition of cannibalism)
- restrictions on sexual activities, gender roles and interpersonal relationships (examples include homosexuality and paraphilias (such as fornication, adultery, interreligious marriage, miscegenation, homosexuality, incest, bestiality, pedophilia, necrophilia).
- restrictions of bodily functions (burping, flatulence, defecation, urination, masturbation, nosepicking, and spitting) in public. Also, the requirement in some societies for women to be secretive about menstruation.
- restrictions on state of genitalia (circumcision or sex reassignment)
- restrictions on exposure of body parts (pornography and nudity)
- taboos on illicit drugs, substance abuse and addictions to legal drugs such as alcohol (alcoholism)
- restrictions on the use of offensive language also known as obscenity and vulgarity
- restriction on gestures
- taboo on slavery
And, I would post a link that has a whole bunch of enlightening information on this subject, but it has a lot of creepy pictures (old art and stuff like) so I won't.
----
"The first detailed studies of zoophilia date from prior to 1910. Peer reviewed research into zoophilia in its own right started around 1960. However, a number of the most oft-quoted studies, such as Miletski, were not published in peer-reviewed journals. There have been several significant modern books, from Masters (1962) to Beetz (2002), but each of them has drawn and agreed on several broad conclusions:
1. The critical aspect to study was emotion, relationship, and motive, it is important not to just assess or judge the sexual act alone in isolation, or as "an act", without looking deeper. (Masters, Miletski, Beetz)
2. Zoophiles' emotions and care to animals can be real, relational, authentic and (within animals' abilities) reciprocal, and not just a substitute or means of expression. (Masters, Miletski, Weinberg, Beetz)
3. Most zoophiles have (or have also had) long term human relationships as well or at the same time as zoosexual ones. (Masters, Beetz)
4. Society in general at present is considerably misinformed about zoophilia, its stereotypes, and its meaning. (Masters, Miletski, Weinberg, Beetz)
5. Contrary to popular belief, there is in fact significant popular or "latent" interest in zoophilia, either in fantasy, animal mating, or reality. (Nancy Friday, Massen, Masters)
6. The distinction between zoophilia and zoosadism is a critical one, and highlighted by each of these studies.
7. Masters (1962), Miletski (1999) and Weinberg (2003) each comment significantly on the social harm caused by these, and other common misunderstandings: "This destroy[s] the lives of many citizens"."