Teen Forums - Teen Chat, Teen Help, Teen Advice & Support

I know they're from the same director, but that doesn't mean it's the same thing in two versions...

Rise of The Planet Of The Apes can be compared to Jurassic Park.

But I'm always open to opinion, can you share the factors of comparison?

What I'm trying to say is that there are numerous factors that can be compared regardless of the genre of the film. For example, you can compare how well the director achieves his goal, even if the goals differ from film to film. The quality of the Cinematography can usually be judged. The camera work (camera angles, camera placement, movement etc). The quality of acting, Framing and certain cutting and continuity techniques as well. Sometimes historical impact can also come into play. Those factors are usually pretty universal regardless of genre.

There are other factors that can be used against a certain movie if it doesn't work. For example, Pacing, scriptwriting, directing style,The color and lens choices of the director, the use of the chosen aspect ratio. And if there are more of these things not working in a film than in another film then chances are the first one isn't as good.

But that's if you look at it from an artistic point of view. If you are looking at it from a entertainment point of view than I agree with you.

Last night i watched this movie and movie is interesting.




..................................

Ah, but you did go full on artistic and technical there. While I myself may not have a problem with that, I was talking about movies in general. Like, you may say that Full Metal Jacket was a much better movie than BattleA because of the sound Effects or physical and mental fatigue portrayed and so and so...

BUT, ExCELLENT POINT.

It was depressing. I wudda seen FD5 if I wanted to see all those deaths...